All lens talk aside, I think it makes more sense to look for the common ground that all the best examples share.
Also one would have to separate different types of 3D from each other, because they work in different ways. A discussion would have to take place for each different kind, the most common being the effect that is caused by the transition from sharp to unsharp parts of the image. Also contributors should only be those that agree that this kind of 3D is in fact working for them.
After finding the most important aspects a discussion about which kind of situation, light and processing are helpful or even important, ONLY THEN should the discussion continue which lenses can help the cause with their special way to render a scene.
IMHO one of the best lenses out there that give you natural 3D more often than others is the Sony/Zeiss Planar 1.4/50 ZA.
This is an example by "Flaschengeist" in the German systemkamera-forum: Bus by Flaschengeist
Here is one of my own that surprised me that way:
All lens talk aside, I think it makes more sense to look for the common ground that all the best examples share.
Also one would have to separate different types of 3D from each other, because they work in different ways. A discussion would have to take place for each different kind, the most common being the effect that is caused by the transition from sharp to unsharp parts of the image. Also contributors should only be those that agree that this kind of 3D is in fact working for them.
After finding the most important aspects a discussion about which kind of situation, light and processing are helpful or even important, ONLY THEN should the discussion continue which lenses can help the cause with their special way to render a scene.
Aug 03, 2019 at 08:36 AM
Previous versions of Rob70's message #14933545 « which lens has the most 3D POP? »
