Re: Nikon/Canon/Sony Image Quality SUCKS vs Panasonic's Multi-Shot High-Res Mode
molson wrote: nazdravanul wrote:
I've been and still am (present tense) a subscriber for almost 10 years. A few months from now, a 70MP Sony / Canon / Nikon body with multishot capabilites (one can only wish) could make those comments obsolete, don't you think ?
If you've been reading his reviews for that long, then you know that he often changes his mind about the merits of a product once he discovers some little glitch, or gets frustrated when he can't figure out how something works because he didn't read the manual...
I guess others are getting tired of Lloyd's hysterics as well... he send me an email this morning begging me to pre-order an A7R IV through his affiliate link because B&H won't give him a review copy otherwise. How pathetic.
He sent everyone the same email. It's not pathetic. It's being honest. Ok, can we, please, move away from diglloyd bashing ?
This thread is not about diglloyd, is about multishot images vs single shot. The absolute superiority of those was proved not only by diglloyd (with loads of images and solid testing) but by several other reputable sources, mentioned elsewhere in this thread.
Yes, there is no contest in IQ between a 40-50 MP Bayer single shot and a 200 MP true-color multishot. Which we all knew for 10 years now, ever since Sinar and Hasselblad multishot solutions were showing the exact same results. That's why they were used in critical art reproduction and product shots, in studios across the world.
Sony's latest release with the 240 MP pixel shift shows, again, the same thing.
Sorry, but this thread shows that "hysterics" tends to apply a lot more to the Lloyd bashers, themselves with a very vivid and off-topic rethoric, than the character himself.
Jul 18, 2019 at 08:58 AM
Previous versions of nazdravanul's message #14915584 « Nikon/Canon/Sony Image Quality vs Panasonic's Multi-Shot High-Res Mode »
