jeffersoncasey wrote:
Does larger format than FF count? I used RX1R and A9 but and since switched to GFX system and have seen 3D pop that's nothing like before.
+1
I'm still amazed by how different the GFX photos look with "f/2 equivalent" lenses. I have the 45/2.8 and 63/2.8, and both are better than anything I've tried on FF. I almost feel sorry for those who buy Otus lenses instead of a camera with larger sensor. Both GF lenses have a sort of "large DOF" with very abrupt transition to out-of-focus, and low contrast bokeh as well. Samuli Vahonen would love these.
And, it's not about short DOF. I also have the Mitakon 65/1.4 and it's not even close to the 63/2.8 when it comes to "pop" and "3D".
There is some funkiness in the bokeh towards the corners, but still better than anything equivalent on FF that I've seen. It goes away completely if you focus closer and/or stop down a bit.
Apr 28, 2019 at 03:13 AM
Previous versions of Makten's message #14834799 « which lens has the most 3D POP? »
Both GF lenses have a sort of "large DOF" with very abrupt transition to out-of-focus, and low contrast bokeh as well. Samuli Vahonen would love these. 
