fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of zeitlos's message #14712913 « Sigma MC-11: Compatibility, Performance Thread. »

  

zeitlos
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Sigma MC-11: Compatibility, Performance Thread.


Thanks! Those look great. Do you remember how many of a row were out of focus?
Is there a difference with regard to the af between a7iii and a7iiir?

stripedrex wrote:

zeitlos wrote:
stripedrex wrote:
I have this lens on an A7RIII at home with the metabones and it works great. I also have the MC11, I'll give it a shot when I get home and report back. I believe I have used it on the A7R2 when I had that with MC11 but I recall preferring it on the MB.


Wow, that would be great! I highly appreciate your efforts! Especially if you got the comparison with the Metabones which will make it easier for people like me to make a decision which one is the one to go with this lens!

Thanks a lot!


Remember i have the a7r3 so not apples to apples for you. Both adapters worked with eye detect but metabones 4 seemwd better with tracking and seemed more reliable af accuracy wise. I didnt do a formal test really. Click my flickr on the left my photostram i used the 135l with mb4. I tested tracking at low burst with my son on the bike. It did quite well t 3fps.




Jan 03, 2019 at 03:18 AM





  Previous versions of zeitlos's message #14712913 « Sigma MC-11: Compatibility, Performance Thread. »