Re: "Official" Nikon 500 f/5.6E PF Discussion and Image Thread
@jemini@@@
I do not have any account to post pictures here, but there are many examples that can be found online. Maybe you were not able to tell even if it is right in front of you.
I have saw promotional pictures used by Nikon for the 500mm PF showing #1, but I couldn't find it a while ago. Maybe they have taken it down. It is a picture of a flock of birds flying at around sunset 🌇 showing this symptom that even they did acknowledge that it can happen in certain conditions.
As for #2, just take a look at the background on p.63 #10. Due to the Fresnel element, it makes pictures look sharp and contrasty which works against it in this case for creamy Boehner. Noticed that the picture has been replaced with another similar looking one which does not show as much of a problem on Flickr.
Apologize to the poster MedicineMan404 for using it as an example. As for the bird, it does look sharp and beautiful.
Re: "Official" Nikon 500 f/5.6E PF Discussion and Image Thread
@jemini@@
I do not have any account to post pictures here, but there are many examples that can be found online. Maybe you were not able to tell even if it is right in front of you.
I have saw promotional pictures used by Nikon for the 500mm PF showing #1, but I couldn't find it a while ago. Maybe they have taken it down. It is a picture of a flock of birds flying at around sunset 🌇 showing this symptom that even they did acknowledge that it can happen in certain conditions.
As for #2, just take a look at the background on p.63 #10. Due to the Fresnel element, it makes pictures look sharp and contrasty which works against it in this case for creamy bokeh.
Apologize to the poster MedicineMan404 for using it as an example. As for the bird, it does look sharp and beautiful.
Oct 31, 2018 at 06:56 AM
Previous versions of hans98ko's message #14648172 « "Official" Nikon 500 f/5.6E PF Discussion and Image Thread »
