Thank you kindly, lieber Werner! I am a fan of your images - please keep'm coming.
________________________________
Yes, the Sigma 135mm Art lens is bulky and heavy but this lens really hasn't stopped to amaze me since day one. Looking at the images I took with this lens makes me feel that it does fit my style better than the upcoming 105mm f/1.4. Though it is a tad slower but since it has a longer FL, the OOF bokeh is just gorgeous...
Joshua -- Thank you for your encouraging comments about my Pasadena series. Much appreciated, my friend!
***************************
I have to comment on your use of the Sigma 135 -- truly outstanding, and I think this latest post shows it at its best in your hands. The color, the details at only f/2.0, the wonderful skin tones and contrast overall -- I think it perfectly suits you and your style, right in there with what I've seen you do using the 85 and 35/1.4. Maybe the Sigma 105 will also be magic for you as well, but whether you try it or not, you have a real winner in this 135.
This rose in the spotlight is for you!
Thank you - I truly appreciate the gesture, Jim! And yes to Pasadena!
_______________________________
A little bit of a cultural touch from Bali..
Double post, sorry. I will delete it as soon as Werner has deleted his. I didn't realize it .... Sorry, Werner. You can re-post it right after I have deleted mine. I am stranding by....
Thank you kindly, lieber Werner! I am a fan of your images - please keep'm coming.
________________________________
Yes, the Sigma 135mm Art lens is bulky and heavy but this lens really hasn't stopped to amaze me since day one. Looking at the images I took with this lens makes me feel that it does fit my style better than the upcoming 105mm f/1.4. Though it is a tad slower but since it has a longer FL, the OOF bokeh is just gorgeous...
Joshua -- Thank you for your encouraging comments about my Pasadena series. Much appreciated, my friend!
***************************
I have to comment on your use of the Sigma 135 -- truly outstanding, and I think this latest post shows it at its best in your hands. The color, the details at only f/2.0, the wonderful skin tones and contrast overall -- I think it perfectly suits you and your style, right in there with what I've seen you do using the 85 and 35/1.4. Maybe the Sigma 105 will also be magic for you as well, but whether you try it or not, you have a real winner in this 135.
This rose in the spotlight is for you!
Thank you - I truly appreciate the gesture, Jim! And yes to Pasadena!
_______________________________
A little bit of a cultural touch from Bali..
Double post, sorry. I will delete it as soon as Werner does. I didn't realize it .... Sorry, Werner. You can post it right after I I have deleted mine. I am stranding by....
Thank you kindly, lieber Werner! I am a fan of your images - please keep'm coming.
________________________________
Yes, the Sigma 135mm Art lens is bulky and heavy but this lens really hasn't stopped to amaze me since day one. Looking at the images I took with this lens makes me feel that it does fit my style better than the upcoming 105mm f/1.4. Though it is a tad slower but since it has a longer FL, the OOF bokeh is just gorgeous...
Joshua -- Thank you for your encouraging comments about my Pasadena series. Much appreciated, my friend!
***************************
I have to comment on your use of the Sigma 135 -- truly outstanding, and I think this latest post shows it at its best in your hands. The color, the details at only f/2.0, the wonderful skin tones and contrast overall -- I think it perfectly suits you and your style, right in there with what I've seen you do using the 85 and 35/1.4. Maybe the Sigma 105 will also be magic for you as well, but whether you try it or not, you have a real winner in this 135.
This rose in the spotlight is for you!
Thank you - I truly appreciate the gesture, Jim! And yes to Pasadena!
_______________________________
A little bit of a cultural touch from Bali..
Double post, sorry. I will delete it as soon as Werner does. I didn't realize it ....
Thank you kindly, lieber Werner! I am a fan of your images - please keep'm coming.
________________________________
Yes, the Sigma 135mm Art lens is bulky and heavy but this lens really hasn't stopped to amaze me since day one. Looking at the images I took with this lens makes me feel that it does fit my style better than the upcoming 105mm f/1.4. Though it is a tad slower but since it has a longer FL, the OOF bokeh is just gorgeous...
Joshua -- Thank you for your encouraging comments about my Pasadena series. Much appreciated, my friend!
***************************
I have to comment on your use of the Sigma 135 -- truly outstanding, and I think this latest post shows it at its best in your hands. The color, the details at only f/2.0, the wonderful skin tones and contrast overall -- I think it perfectly suits you and your style, right in there with what I've seen you do using the 85 and 35/1.4. Maybe the Sigma 105 will also be magic for you as well, but whether you try it or not, you have a real winner in this 135.
This rose in the spotlight is for you!
Thank you - I truly appreciate the gesture, Jim! And yes to Pasadena!
_______________________________
A little bit of a cultural touch from Bali..
Jun 08, 2018 at 09:00 AM
Previous versions of AGeoJO's message #14493776 « Sony FE Images Thread »
