Re: Hasselblad C 250 f/5.6 Superachromat on Fuji GFX
]Steve Spencer wrote:
Dan,
This thread isn't about your chart. My view is that your chart is potentially misleading and not very useful, and I have made my reasoning about that clear. I have not said that you or your chart was unethical or that you are intentionally trying to mislead people. I am done talking about your chart. Your introduction of it in this thread and your defense of it has totally gotten the thread off track. If you want to discuss your chart please start a separate thread and I will dutifully ignore it.
I'll take that as being as close as you'll go to a retraction and to admitting that my chart is accurate, that it doesn't differ from what I would obtain from your alternate source, and that all the other stuff you wrote was about how someone else might misinterpret my accurate data.
You could have saved a lot of words by just writing that instead of offering the distracting implication that my data were incorrect. Something like, "Your data are accurate. Those using the chart will want to consider..." (Your implications, unfortunately, presented me with a choice between leaving them unanswered or offering a lengthy "diatribe" of my own to get to the core of your misleading claims.)
Dan
May 13, 2018 at 09:33 AM
Previous versions of gdanmitchell's message #14466377 « Hasselblad C 250 f/5.6 Superachromat on Fuji GFX »
