C_n_red_again wrote:
I’d be ok with a 50-150 2.8 if one focus motor keeps down cost.
I don't really understand peoples desire for short range telephotos that end at 150? They are far to short for event work and not wide enough, and for portrait work they are a weird middle ground where your would get more use out of primes.
A 50-150 is a weird overlap for the 28-75. Maybe a modern 80-200.
May 11, 2018 at 06:17 AM
Previous versions of Geoff CB's message #14464582 « In stock: Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 E-mount ($799) »
