Re: FM Review of the Voigtlander 40mm f/1.2 Nokton
Regarding the 0.95 - interesting, they don't seem afraid to really cluster their lenses. 35/1.2 (M), 35/1.4, 35/1.7 (M), 40/1.4 (M), 40/1.2 (FE), 50/1.2 (M), 50/1.1 (M), 50/1.5 (M), etc.
I can't imagine that a 0.95 would be outside of the 35-50 range, so where does it fit in there? Maybe they're replacing the 50/1.1 with a 50/.95 in both mounts? hmm.
Apr 09, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Previous versions of Taylor Sherman's message #14429782 « Voigtlander 40mm f/1.2 Nokton Review »