Re: FM Review of the Voigtlander 40mm f/1.2 Nokton
imagesfromobjects wrote:The rendering/vibe is very similar - painterly character and sharp center wide open, crunchy egde-to-edge sharpness from f/4 or so.
Thanks, nice to know. Was like this with Fuji? Yeah I really liked FF, but I really couldn't tell the difference with most of my shots if it was FF or crop (I shoot a lot with focal reducers or f/1.4 and f/1.2 glass on Fuji), especially when used the same lens (like Minolta 55 with FF or Fuji & focal reducer). Had the A7II for a year and loved the IQ I got from it. I just decided to go Fuji way for other reasons. And now I would really love to have a great feeling manual glass that performed close to the XF35/1.4. Might pull the trigger with Nokton.
Re: FM Review of the Voigtlander 40mm f/1.2 Nokton
imagesfromobjects wrote:The rendering/vibe is very similar - painterly character and sharp center wide open, crunchy egde-to-edge sharpness from f/4 or so.
Thanks, nice to know. Was like this with Fuji? Yeah I really liked FF, but I really couldn't tell the difference with most of my shots if it was FF or crop (I shoot a lot with focal reducers or f/1.4 and f/1.2 glass on Fuji). Had the A7II for a year and loved the IQ I got from it. I just decided to go Fuji way for other reasons. And now I would really love to have a great feeling manual glass that performed close to the XF35/1.4. Might pull the trigger with Nokton.
Re: FM Review of the Voigtlander 40mm f/1.2 Nokton
imagesfromobjects wrote:The rendering/vibe is very similar - painterly character and sharp center wide open, crunchy egde-to-edge sharpness from f/4 or so.
Thanks, nice to know. Was like this with Fuji? Yeah I really liked FF, but I really couldn't tell the difference with most of my shots if it was FF or crop. Had the A7II for a year and loved the IQ I got from it. I just decided to go Fuji way for other reasons. And now I would really love to have a great feeling manual glass that performed close to the XF35/1.4. Might pull the trigger with Nokton.