DannyBurkPhoto wrote:
Not for me...I was happy to sell it and replace with a Loxia 50.
First, I didn't care for the rendering - I've heard this described as "sterile" many times. Not a term that I'd have used - I don't know that I can actually put my finger on it, but I didn't like it.
I agree 100% with this. I feel that the Loxia somehow has more pop than the 55/1.8 and I've been much happier with the images I'm getting from it. More color/contrast, no onion rings, less CA. And still plenty sharp wide open.. 50 also gaps better between 35 and 85.
Jan 09, 2018 at 02:39 PM
Previous versions of MrTMan's message #14320103 « Is the 1.8/55 an all-time great? »