nandadevieast wrote:
imaging-resource has posted their performance test and they are saying it is slower than R2 in many respects. Experts?
The respects were startup time, mode switching and AF acquisition speeds in bright light.
These looked to me to be close to margin of error in the measurements, and they are all respects in which the r2 was fine. So it's safe to say, I think, that in a few respects in which the R2 was fine the R3 is no better. But in many respects in which the R3 was *not* fine, the the R3 is much better.
Dec 21, 2017 at 12:39 AM
Previous versions of DavidBM's message #14297656 « FM members A7R III first impressions »
