Well, iiuc I-R uses (or used to iirc) the same lenses (Sigma @ diff mounts) so they can keep the T-stop and aperture equal. And if the studio lighting is consistent ... why do you suggest that their RAW's aren't viable for consideration?
Am I missing something, here?
Also, I'm mostly interested in learning what the 6D2 CAN do. Personally, it doesn't matter if another camera has the ability to glow in the dark because it is made of Uranium. The primary matter at hand for me (at this juncture) is to understand the limits and capabilities of the 6D2. Not to whine if it isn't the best of the best of the best of the best or to cry foul if it is off by 1/3 of an EV in testing.
Of course, if I'm making a grossly fundamental error or lack of understanding, then certainly I want a good from the collective brain trust to get me back on track.
Jul 22, 2017 at 05:32 PM
Previous versions of RustyBug's message #14116061 « Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II »
from the collective brain trust to get me back on track. 