fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of Ralph Conway's message #14101440 « Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II »

  

Ralph Conway
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


Dima135 wrote:
It's very strange that the Canon does not care about DR. If I buy a big, expensive camera with not the best autofocus, not the fastest, not the lighest and pocketable - I want quality, good potential for processing, good textures and low artefacts. Some inexpensive crop 1.5 body give a slightly less detail, but who cares when this detail will drown in the noise and artifacts after postprocessing ? And I'm not talking about some extreme pushing shadows. All who works with 5d3 or 5d2 and who need to save large resolution files with clean textures and pure details knows what i talking about.


You are talking about the smallest, cheapest (at introduction), lightest, fastest Canon FF camera 6D II here with extremly enhanced AF, arenīt you? It might fit into your pocket, but I am pretty sure it will not feel very comfortable.

5D II is a 9 year old body, 5D III a 7 year old one. Both where already overhelmed by 6D in Thermes of IQ (clean texture and pure detail, top High ISO capabilities, size and price) 5 years ago. As far I understand, it is overhelmed in as good as nearly all points by its newly introduced follow up 6D II. Except it seems 6D II remain at the same/comparable base level at low ISO settings and video capabilities.

Its okay, when you find this very strange. But I do not see that it means that Canon does not care about DR.

Conny



Jul 10, 2017 at 04:53 AM
Ralph Conway
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


Dima135 wrote:
It's very strange that the Canon does not care about DR. If I buy a big, expensive camera with not the best autofocus, not the fastest, not the lighest and pocketable - I want quality, good potential for processing, good textures and low artefacts. Some inexpensive crop 1.5 body give a slightly less detail, but who cares when this detail will drown in the noise and artifacts after postprocessing ? And I'm not talking about some extreme pushing shadows. All who works with 5d3 or 5d2 and who need to save large resolution files with clean textures and pure details knows what i talking about.


You are talking about the smallest, cheapest (at introduction), lightest, fastest Canon FF camera 6D II here with extremly enhanced AF, arenīt you? It might fit into your pocket, but I am pretty sure it will not feel very comfortable.

5D II is a 9 year old body, 5D III a 6 year old one. Both where already overhelmed by 6D in Thermes of IQ (clean texture and pure detail, top High ISO capabilities, size and price) 5 years ago. As far I understand, it is overhelmed in as good as nearly all points by its newly introduced follow up 6D II. Except it seems 6D II remain at the same/comparable base level at low ISO settings and video capabilities.

Its okay, when you find this very strange. But I do not see that it means that Canon does not care about DR.

Conny



Jul 10, 2017 at 04:52 AM
Ralph Conway
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


Dima135 wrote:
It's very strange that the Canon does not care about DR. If I buy a big, expensive camera with not the best autofocus, not the fastest, not the lighest and pocketable - I want quality, good potential for processing, good textures and low artefacts. Some inexpensive crop 1.5 body give a slightly less detail, but who cares when this detail will drown in the noise and artifacts after postprocessing ? And I'm not talking about some extreme pushing shadows. All who works with 5d3 or 5d2 and who need to save large resolution files with clean textures and pure details knows what i talking about.


You are talking about the smallest, cheapest (at introduction), lightest, fastest Canon FF camera 6D II here with extremly enhanced AF, arenīt you? It might fit into your pocket, but I am pretty sure it will not feel very comfortable.

5D II is a 9 year old body, 5D III a 6 year old one. Both where already overhelmed by 6D in Thermes of IQ (clean texture and pure detail, top High ISO capabilities, size and price 5 years ago. As far I understand, it is overhelmed in all cases by its newly introduced follow up 6D II. Except it seems 6D II remain at the same/comparable base level at low ISO settings.

Its okay, when you find this very strange. But I do not see that it means that Canon does not care about DR.

Conny



Jul 10, 2017 at 04:46 AM





  Previous versions of Ralph Conway's message #14101440 « Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II »