RustyBug
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
|
 Re: Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II | |
Everythingis1 wrote:
RustyBug wrote:
Everythingis1 wrote:
It's really quite sad. Instead of thinking "It's a shame this nice camera has terrible video capabilities" , like a normal thinking person, some people would rather make excuses of any type necessary to defend their brand of choice as if they personally were attacked in some way.
"You don't deserve 4k on a $2000 camera."
"That other camera might have $5000 more worth of features (in Canon world) but it's grip is smaller for when I'm taking pictures with my 6 pound lens with one hand"
"No other Full frame camera at exactly this price has 4k, so this one shouldn't either"
You people sound like battered spouses. Arguing against the absolute truth, that this camera would be better with 4k video capabilities, is substantially more crazy than them leaving it out.
Let's see ...
"insane"
"battered spouses"
"crazy"
(not) "normal-thinking"
This is FM ... not some other Cyber Forum. Psuedo hyperbolic ad hominem of your fellow FM'ers probably isn't the best form to present, nor aids credible establishment. I realize that you have a sum total of only a few dozen posts ... but, you might want to review what the FM decorum expectations are.
The fact is that you are (group) attacking your fellow FM'ers through your incessant assault on those who are of a different opinion than you with the name calling, etc.. Most seasoned FM'ers are polite enough to let it slide, or simply "go quiet". But, I think you might want to review the forum decorum before you go too far astray. If you don't like hearing a "gentle nudge" from me ... shoot Fred himself a PM and inquire his opinion / expectations. You haven't broken any rules of ad hominem directly per se ... but, I think you are missing the intended spirit of FM a bit.
That said, I'll add a belated ... "Welcome to FM. FM ROCKS !!!" 
 , just like I said in my post, you act as though you are personally under attack based on your responses. "attacking", ""assault" - Straight from the horses mouth.
Stick to the merits of the camera ... leave the "you people" out it.
Telling folks that they are making bad decisions or that they are not "normal thinking" / "battered spouses" because you know how much "superior" something else is isn't appropriate. Present your case as objectively, strongly and empassioned as you can, challenge one another to help foster growth and understanding, share your perspective and opinion ... but, please keep an eye to retaining the respect for and dignity of your fellow FM'ers in the process. 
Unfortunately, you seemingly mistake people challenging faulty logic, and incomplete perspective as being somehow "inferior" to your position and opinion or of a lesser mindset. You like things different from others ... super, duper, cooper ... just don't rudely, insult your fellow FM'ers by calling them not normal thinking person, battered spouse or crazy for thinking such as they do. I can assure you that the minds of your fellow FM'ers are just fine (some of the finest minds in the photographic world, actually) ... even, if their opinions, perspectives, wants and needs are significantly different from yours.
Much of our beloved craft is "horses for courses" ... just because others want to run a different course, does not make them such as you have espoused. So, please take the "Canon is evil, Canon is crap." mantra somewhere else ... or at least leave the Canon users are somehow "inferior" in their thinking out of the forum.
Each and every member has a "Fred ordained" expectation that we conduct ourselves with dignity and respect for one another as fellow members of Fred's wonderful and beloved site. This is the cornerstone of FM being FM.
|
