Previous versions of AmbientMike's message #13995949 « Question about portraits with M4/3 »
AmbientMike Offline [X]
Re: Question about portraits with M4/3
MAubrey wrote: AmbientMike wrote:
mitesh wrote: bobbytan wrote:
I will try and do a side-by-side indoor noise test between my E-M1.2 and A7R II.
IIRC, you should see a two-stop advantage for the a7rII.
Go over to the Canon forum and tell them that Nikon beats them by 2 stops on DR, and see if it goes well.
I was looking at a website that said something like that, T6 vs. d3400, this week.
I get sick of people basically running down m4/3 on the m4/3 forum. Unfortunately it has reached the point that I feel I have to take m4/3 side, as opposed to having a rational discussion. ?.
I've been defending μ43 in every comment I've made in this thread, but you should at least know that not everyone is coming to the μ43 forum to run down the system. The thread is also visible in the much larger Alt Gear forum.
I didn't realize it was posted there as well, maybe that is part of the problem?
I read several of the responses, and I was having a hard time seeing anyone buying and using m4/3 after reading this thread. I think even I was even feeling like a chump for using m4/3.
The camera I have used most often over the past 1.5-2 years. And I often have it attached to a supertele or tripod, so weight isn't necessarily a big factor for me.
So I hate to be a fanboy, but I really wasn't seeing another option. I have more respect for fanboys now.
I'd rather be objective, but I don't recall seeing a lot of 7DII vs 5D4 or D500 vs Nikon ff threads on those forums, which would likely make owners of those excellent crop cameras look bad. If I'm objective, it seems to play in to people looking down on m4/3. You see excellent photos from crop cameras, check out some of the boards here.
Apr 11, 2017 at 01:43 PM
Previous versions of AmbientMike's message #13995949 « Question about portraits with M4/3 »
