Interesting, Derek and JonPB, thank you guys
I would note the FLE was one of the better lenses on the stock A7, if memory serves.
In those shots the UT is killing--well beating anyway-- the M9 to my eye, which makes me think the M9 is a touch out of calibration, possibly going past infinity. Just a guess though.
I think with M9 it's not a bad idea to shoot one at the stop and then back off a touch and shoot another.
Looking at the buildings in the distance, the M9 is looking decent, but the people in the garden are not quite the same, but maybe that's the exposure, as the M9 seems to be straining and more glowy. I did not check your shutter.
Anyway the UT is looking very good there, and WB seems basically similar. So a very positive result I think.
Someday we can find a 240 and that will be very interesting.
Interesting, Derek
I would note the FLE was one of the better lenses on the stock A7, if memory serves.
In those shots the UT is killing--well beating anyway-- the M9 to my eye, which makes me think the M9 is a touch out of calibration, possibly going past infinity. Just a guess though.
I think with M9 it's not a bad idea to shoot one at the stop and then back off a touch and shoot another.
Looking at the buildings in the distance, the M9 is looking decent, but the people in the garden are not quite the same, but maybe that's the exposure, as the M9 seems to be straining and more glowy. I did not check your shutter.
Anyway the UT is looking very good there, and WB seems basically similar. So a very positive result I think.
Someday we can find a 240 and that will be very interesting.
Mar 17, 2017 at 01:03 AM
Previous versions of uhoh7's message #13964316 « First Sighting: A7rii Thin filter in action »
