It always great to see comparisons from DPReview, but we are now entering into the realm of diminishing returns with high MP sensors and often the selection of lens, lens alignment, technique is so crucial and may explain the wider variances in bench tests. I even compared the D810 at 64 ISO, and it is surprisingly sharp when we compare at base ISO's.
These test results are significant in that for on screen comparisons there is difference is there but minimal. Of course when you process the RAW's yourself the malleability and feel of the RAW files of the Fuji and Pentax are definitely better. As mentioned before the cost, weight/size, ergonomics, lens selection, and photographic style will be more important for most of us.
In playing with the GFX 50S, the ergonomics and feel are excellent and more importantly the RAW files are superb. The RAW files feel and render very film like and it is quality I love, particularly for lower contrast portraits and landscapes. This is why I loved the A7s for the film like look. The D810 at base ISO of 64 is also superb. Truth is we have so many great options now
Mar 13, 2017 at 10:40 PM
Previous versions of charles.K's message #13959988 « Pre-order: Fujifilm GFX 50S Medium Format body ($6,499) »
