I see the point about ISO 400 onwards, but if somebody is really trying to get the best results they can in a wide DR situation, I would think minimally 1600 through 25600? The way I think I am to read those graphs is to find the flattest area, and then consider just using the ISO at the farthest left of that "line". Perhaps I am misunderstanding the intent though?
I see the point about ISO 400 onwards, but if somebody is really trying to get the best results they can in a wide DR situation, I would think minimally 1600 through 25600? The way I think I am to read those graphs is to find the flattest area, and then consider just using the ISO at the farthest left of that "line". Perhaps I am doing that wrong?
I see the point about ISO 400 onwards, but if somebody is really trying to get the best results they can in a wide DR situation, I would think minimally 1600 through 25600?
From that site, it appears there is little to gain on the 1DX to raise your ISO past 3200. You gain almost nothing in the way of reducing shadow noise by going up from 3200 all the way to 25600. You might as well just set your ISO at 3200 for low light shooting, and pull up shadows during post, and thus increase your overall DR at the same time.
I see the point about ISO 400 onwards, but if somebody is really trying to get the best results they can in a wide DR situation, I would think minimally 1600 through 25600?
