Your point number 4 about the VF stability is actually one of two reasons I sold my Sigma 150-600C. Even after using the dock setting to set it at the most stable option it was just a little too annoying to me after years of rock solid VF stability from Canon IS. The OS worked to spec but the VF bugged me. There were other reasons I sold it but that was a key one.
I have the Sigma 150-600 C as well. The VF shake is nowhere near as bad on the 500 SPORT.
That doesn't sound good!! But with a longer lens you will have more VF shake usually anyways just because you can't hold it as stead with the weight. Let me know how it is after tuning it with the dock!!
So, dynamic OS is FAR better than standard OS. The VF basically stops moving. It's not the floaty VF of a Canon, it really STOPS moving.
How would you say Dynamic OS compares to the regular OS on the 150-600? Have you tried the 150-600 on Dynamic also? Dynamic almost did the trick for me on the 150-600 but it still was a little annoying to me.
Feb 09, 2017 at 11:14 PM
Previous versions of arbitrage's message #13915412 « Sigma 500 Sport - First Impressions »
