fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of AGeoJO's message #13774669 « Sony FE Images Thread »

  

AGeoJO
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: Sony FE Images Thread


Ronny Olsson wrote:
AGeoJO wrote:
JaKo wrote:
^^^ That\'s maybe due to correction of trapezoid effect/cropping. Nevertheless, outstanding sets by thokophoto in the last few pages!

Well, Joshua - beautiful models and great captures. Surely you\'ve got experience of shooting dangerous creatures in tropics so working with gorgeous models must feel less intimidating.

PeterT - you move around fast! If you\'re into snowboarding, hopefully you will revisit Whistler, BC this season

Douglas Liu - I really admire you captures of moods and colours. Very unique and gentle.




Vancouver; one sunny afternoon after one week of rain...















Thank you very much, Jack! I could get easily intimidated by both .

I agree with Douglas that your images have that distinctive look in them, especially the portrait images you posted here.


Here are 2 images from the same session and captured under similar conditions using two different lens on two different cameras. The idea was to compare the Sony 135mm f/1.8 to the Sony GM 70-200mm f/2.8. Quite informal comparison as I didn\'t bother to do that at the same aperture, for example both at f2.8, but both at their respective wide open to get the feel of what each lens can do at f/18 and f/2.8, respectively..

I kicked my self for not realizing that one of them was set at 1/1000sec as the minimum shutter speed, and that\'s was the body where the GM lens was mounted on. That\'s why the resulting ISO for the GM lens was a tad too high. Oh, well. BTW, I made am effort to process the images that they look similar in color rendition, contrast, etc.




Both shot are really good.. but that 135 is a gem


Thank you, Ronny! Yes, I agree with you, the 135mm lens is a gem alright.


Frogfish wrote:
Thanks Joshua, that\'s what I thought it was. Absolutely no objection to your comment on wife & daughter - quite the opposite, a fine compliment so Thank You



Here is another image from the last photoshoot. As good as the 135mm f/1.8 is, the 70-200mm GM is no slouch either.


Oct 22, 2016 at 11:31 AM
AGeoJO
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: Sony FE Images Thread


Ronny Olsson wrote:
Both shot are really good.. but that 135 is a gem

Thank you, Ronny! Yes, I agree with you, the 135mm lens is a gem alright.


Frogfish wrote:
Thanks Joshua, that\'s what I thought it was. Absolutely no objection to your comment on wife & daughter - quite the opposite, a fine compliment so Thank You



Here is another image from the last photoshoot. As good as the 135mm f/1.8 is, the 70-200mm GM is no slouch either.


Oct 22, 2016 at 11:28 AM
AGeoJO
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: Sony FE Images Thread


Ronny Olsson wrote:
Both shot are really good.. but that 135 is a gem

Thank you, Ronny! Yes, I agree with you, the 135mm lens is a gem alright.


Frogfish wrote:
Thanks Joshua, that\'s what I thought it was. Absolutely no objection to your comment on wife & daughter - quite the opposite, a fine compliment so Thank You



Here is another image from the last photoshoot. As good as the 135mm f/1.8 is, the 70-200mm GM is no slouch either.


Oct 22, 2016 at 11:27 AM
AGeoJO
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: Sony FE Images Thread


Frogfish wrote:
AGeoJO wrote:
Frogfish wrote:
AGeoJO wrote:Hi Douglas, neither actually. A bunch of photographers, in this case, 12 photographers, paid the organizer for the event. He/she turns it around uses the money to pay for the venue, which is typically a commercial place, like a B&B or place of events, like for wedding or for parties, etc.. That place will have to be rented for at least 6 hours. We are free to roam around and take pictures on the ground wherever we like for whatever time period we agree upon. A part of the money is used to pay for the rental of the fancy dresses and accessories, for the make-up artists, and to reimburse the models (none of them is a pro model) for their gas expenses plus some extra money maybe. My understanding the organizer doesn\'t make money either but he/she gets the chance of photographing the models for free.

So, nobody really makes money as such, for sure not the photographer. How much do we pay? Well, it depends on the expenses, somewhere between $50-$80 per photographer. For this one, we ended up paying $60.00 and for the French Estate, if you remember, it was $65.00.

Joshua, are you based in SEA ? Your details say CA but your models seem to be mainly Asian (they look Malaysian ?) even though I saw one shot with three caucasians too (that wouldn\'t be surprising in Sing\').

My daughter used to do those \'mutually free\' modeling shoots too when just starting. Tog, model and make-up artist all starting out and trying to build portfolios.


Hi Kevin, that\'s basically it. It is just strictly for fun for me and for the chance of trying out different lenses . I forgot to add to the answer to Douglas\' question, the photogs are supposed to provide images to the models and MUA to add to their portfolio.

I am based in California and in general, with some exceptions, event organizers are not trying to make a living out of this. In Asi,a it is a little bit different. They do not participate in the photography end of it and it is definitely more a way to make a living. But the actual amount they charge, in US $ that is, is relatively lower. Now, the ironic thing is, Asian models are quite popular here in the US but Caucasian models are more in demand in Asia . It just shows that we are very International in our preference. I am sure that you are aware there is a fairly high concentration of Asians here in California.

I have seen some images of your daughter that you posted here. Both your wife and daughter are very lovely. I do not mean any disrespect and I hope you don\'t mind me saying that.

Thanks,
Joshua


Thanks Joshua, that\'s what I thought it was. Absolutely no objection to your comment on wife & daughter - quite the opposite, a fine compliment so Thank You



Here is another image from the last photoshoot. As good as the 135mm f/1.8 is, the 70-200mm GM is no slouch either.



Oct 22, 2016 at 09:11 AM





  Previous versions of AGeoJO's message #13774669 « Sony FE Images Thread »