twinsfan7777 wrote:
This has nothing to do with not understanding light. I understand and am capable of exposing an image correctly, but I like to shoot into the sun to get that dramatic look, so I would either need to bracket the image (more time, need to lug around a tripod) or have a camera with great dynamic range. I\'m trying to save time, so I would prefer if a camera had enough dynamic range where I would not need to bracket and then merge the photos in photoshop. And that brings back the original question, which camera provides the most amount of flexibility in those terms.
You sound like you\'ve already made up your mind. If you think that the single most important parameter is DR, over all the other reasons mentioned, then get the Sony. If you need to shoot quickly and want to \"save time\", I think you\'ll find the Sony disappointing, it is not a fast camera to use.
Do realize, the DR of the Sony is not a panacea, it has around a 2 stop advantage over the mark3 but that is at base ISO. The advantage decreases rapidly as the ISO increase, and by ISO 800 you only have a 1/2 stop advantage or so.
Oct 21, 2016 at 06:41 AM
Previous versions of Iwas joeking's message #13773347 « Canon 5D Mark III or Sony A7ii? »
