fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of naturephoto1's message #13732392 « Pre-order: Fujifilm GFX 50S Medium Format body ($6,499) »

  

naturephoto1
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Official: Fujifilm GFX 50S Medium Format Announced!


Steve Spencer wrote:
Matt Grum wrote:
alundeb wrote:
Today, the least likely reason for a high base ISO is high sensitivity, because QE is about maxed out already.


Ah but there\'s plenty of scope to reduce QE (or sensitivity in general, hence if I saw a sensor announced with ISO 12 or 25 I would be sceptical...


Buffalonian wrote:
The MF dof and math related ot it is superior.


Not with the lenses currently available for MF, if you want shallower depth of field for portraits 35mm is better.


Matt if you shoot portraits at an aspect ration of 4 to 3 or squarer (such as 4 to 5 for an 8 X 10 or 16 X 20), then the crop factor for FF 35mm compared to this mini MF is 1.38X. So the Fuji 110 f/2 will be very similar in effective focal length and depth of field to an 80mm f/1.4 lens on 35mm FF. The FF 35mm will still have the slightest advantage, but it may well be within the rounding range of how aperture is reported, and sure there are a couple 85mm f/1.2 lenses for FF 35mm, but the Fuji 110 for portraits will be very very close in creating depth of field for portraits to what you can get on FF 35mm at least if you crop to most typical framing ratios for portraits.


Hi Steve,

Now with the announcement of the to be released Fujifilm camera, doyou intend to still go forward with your preorder of the new Hassselblad or are you now rethinking this purchase?

Rich




Sep 20, 2016 at 01:02 PM
naturephoto1
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Official: Fujifilm GFX 50S Medium Format Announced!


Steve Spencer wrote:
Matt Grum wrote:
alundeb wrote:
Today, the least likely reason for a high base ISO is high sensitivity, because QE is about maxed out already.


Ah but there\'s plenty of scope to reduce QE (or sensitivity in general, hence if I saw a sensor announced with ISO 12 or 25 I would be sceptical...


Buffalonian wrote:
The MF dof and math related ot it is superior.


Not with the lenses currently available for MF, if you want shallower depth of field for portraits 35mm is better.


Matt if you shoot portraits at an aspect ration of 4 to 3 or squarer (such as 4 to 5 for an 8 X 10 or 16 X 20), then the crop factor for FF 35mm compared to this mini MF is 1.38X. So the Fuji 110 f/2 will be very similar in effective focal length and depth of field to an 80mm f/1.4 lens on 35mm FF. The FF 35mm will still have the slightest advantage, but it may well be within the rounding range of how aperture is reported, and sure there are a couple 85mm f/1.2 lenses for FF 35mm, but the Fuji 110 for portraits will be very very close in creating depth of field for portraits to what you can get on FF 35mm at least if you crop to most typical framing ratios for portraits.


Hi Steve,

Now with the announcement of the to be released Fujifilm camera, do intend to still go forward with your preorder of the new Hassselblad or are you now rethinking this purchase?

Rich




Sep 20, 2016 at 12:55 PM





  Previous versions of naturephoto1's message #13732392 « Pre-order: Fujifilm GFX 50S Medium Format body ($6,499) »