RSHPhotography wrote:
No way a 100mm touches the compression of a 200.
It won\'t, but it will offer more background blur if the background is within 15 meters of the subject. For portrait and wedding photographers this is a very common scenario, so the 105 may actually be more useful to them in the field. But if you\'re literally in a field, the 200 would be better.
Aug 13, 2016 at 09:44 AM
Previous versions of Lauchlan Toal's message #13679075 « Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread »
