Re: Official: Hasselblad X1D-50c Medium Format Mirrorless
Yes and no . Problem is the larger photo site sensors also had less DR so it had more punch. But you are correct if holding more data but those sensors had far less DR so shadow areas blocked up more and less range. In turn it had a lot of punch. My old P25 was I think 9.2 but the DR was ver low but the color jumped off the screen. A lot of folks like those fat pixel sensors because of it .
Fred Miranda wrote: GMPhotography wrote:
Regardless of the DR there is just a ton of adjustment though and raw files can take quite a bit of adjustments. The Kodak sensors like this P45,P30 and P25 are all pretty big pixel pitches . Some call them big fat pixels and color is very rich coming off these sensors.
My theory is that bigger pixels allows for a stronger color filter array which translates to better tonal range and color response. All things being equal, MF sensors will always have the advantage.
Jun 27, 2016 at 04:22 PM
Previous versions of GMPhotography's message #13621159 « Official: Hasselblad X1D-50c Medium Format Mirrorless »
