I guess I don\'t really get it that much. The advantage of this over something like the A7R II is...what, exactly? Sure, you\'ll get a bit cleaner base ISO images...a bit wider dynamic range probably...and....that\'s it? The A7R II already gets you nearly the same resolution, the dynamic range is fantastic and low ISO noise is already very low. With the lenses as slow as they are, you don\'t gain anything at higher ISOs at all, and you don\'t gain any shallower depth of field. Heck, the Fuji system will show shallower DOF than these lenses here.
So, $9K for slightly better ISO 100 image quality? What am I missing here? If this were a full 645 sized sensor, or even more exciting, a 6x7, I could understand the excitement, but is there even any guarantee that the slightly larger size will outperform Sony\'s awesome full frame sensor?
Jun 21, 2016 at 12:55 PM
Previous versions of Jman13's message #13612962 « Official: Hasselblad X1D-50c Medium Format Mirrorless »
