fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of sjms's message #13596736 « XQD vs CF? »

  

sjms
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: XQD vs CF?


RKnecht wrote:
I also like the XQD cards. However, I find that CF cards are built much better. All of my XQD cards are falling apart. Flimsy sides are breaking off. I have CF cards that are going on 7 years old now without any issues. My 6 month old Sony XQD cards are falling apart. I haven\'t tried the Lexar branded cards yet, but they are next. If/when I get a D5, I\'ll go with CF. By the time I sell the camera, it will be worth nothing anyway.


I\'ve been using XQD since the D4 and I do roll all cards every 2-3 years. physically and electrically I have had no issue with any of my G series Sony cards (4) and also none with my Lexar 2933x cards (2). these cards do see substantial use. since they as do CF cards go in only one way I have observed users trying to give that extra effort to see if these cards will go in any which way. that of course leads to \"issues\". from what I can see that\'s pretty much the only way to do them harm.



Jun 08, 2016 at 10:15 PM
sjms
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: XQD vs CF?


RKnecht wrote:
I also like the XQD cards. However, I find that CF cards are built much better. All of my XQD cards are falling apart. Flimsy sides are breaking off. I have CF cards that are going on 7 years old now without any issues. My 6 month old Sony XQD cards are falling apart. I haven\'t tried the Lexar branded cards yet, but they are next. If/when I get a D5, I\'ll go with CF. By the time I sell the camera, it will be worth nothing anyway.


I\'ve been using XQD since the D4 and I do roll all cards every 2-3 years. physically and electrically I have had no issue with any of my G series Sony cards (4) and also none with my Lexar 2933x cards (2). these cards do see substantial use. I since they as do CF cards go in only one way I have observed users trying to give that extra effort to see if these cards will go in any which way. that of course leads to \"issues\". from what I can see that\'s pretty much the only way to do them harm.



Jun 08, 2016 at 06:19 PM
sjms
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: XQD vs CF?


RKnecht wrote:
I also like the XQD cards. However, I find that CF cards are built much better. All of my XQD cards are falling apart. Flimsy sides are breaking off. I have CF cards that are going on 7 years old now without any issues. My 6 month old Sony XQD cards are falling apart. I haven\'t tried the Lexar branded cards yet, but they are next. If/when I get a D5, I\'ll go with CF. By the time I sell the camera, it will be worth nothing anyway.


I\'ve been using XQD since the D4 and I do roll all cards every 2-3 years. physically and electrically I have had no issue with any of my G series Sony cards (4) and also none with my Lexar 2933x cards (2). these cards do see substantial use. I since they as do CF cards go in only one way I have observed users trying to give that extra effort to see if these cards will go in any which way. that of course leads to \"issues\". many an enthusiastic individual will place blame where it rarely does stick.




Jun 08, 2016 at 06:04 PM





  Previous versions of sjms's message #13596736 « XQD vs CF? »