That we just don\'t know yet as for me never shot the canon but my guess if you ask for the secret it\'s going to be in the look of the Sony. Personally my belief is this just from what I\'m seeing so far . You will have a choice Sony great look to lens great falloff, great bokeh, no onion rings or very diminished and round bokeh balls. Canon just maybe the more clinical in look lens. It may come down to pick your poison . But let me add something if I can get away from that Metabones adapter I will do everything in my power to do it even buy all Sigma with there new adapter. I love having all the AF functionality that Sony gave us and I don\'t want to use a half baked solution like the MB unless I have to like the 135 right now. I did not even mention Eye AF. So for me canon glass is off the table. If I was forced into adapters than I would go Sigma and with their new adapter we get full AF function. Now if you have canon cams as well than you have the MB at limited abilities. Until Metabones can get full AF function it will remain a half baked solution. so for me could care less what the canon zoom does or how good it maybe the AF abilities alone in Sony will make me buy native or Sigma now. I still may go back and buy the Sigma 35 1.4 Art lens but not until that adapter is on the market.
Maybe if someone has both lenses which would be rare than hopefully they can test them.
Honestly I\'m at the point I dont want A mount and I don\'t want Canon glass as both system lenses are a half baked solution. We now have new native options and if your commuted to Sony than one may want to consider selling them off. Many might not agree with this and totally understand we are talking more investment dollars and limited budgets for folks. Buying and selling stuff for me at least is a royal PITA and it stresses me out. I have come to hate it but I have to do this crazy stuff sometimes and it really gets under my skin. I got caught with my pants down with cash to get the 24-70 and 85 at the same time and had to sell my Loxia 50 which I did not want to do. I can\'t blame anyone but myself here as I have zero patience and wanted both now. So I wind up kicking myself and my dear friends here think I\'m a nut case. Their probably right. Lol it\'s called moving money behind the closed prying eyes of spouses. ROTFLMAO . My lovely wife would have no problem putting me in a white panel truck with a new white suit on me. Lol
That we just don\'t know yet as for me never shot the canon but my guess if you ask for the secret it\'s going to be in the look of the Sony. Personally my belief is this just from what I\'m seeing so far . You will have a choice Sony great look to lens great falloff, great bokeh, no onion rings or very diminished and round bokeh balls. Canon just maybe the more clinical in look lens. It may come down to pick your poison . But let me add something if I can get away from that Metabones adapter I will do everything in my power to do it even buy all Sigma with there new adapter. I love having all the AF functionality that Sony gave us and I don\'t want to use a half baked solution like the MB unless I have to like the 135 right now. I did not even mention Eye AF. So for me canon glass is off the table. If I was forced into adapters than I would go Sigma and with their new adapter we get full AF function. Now if you have canon cams as well than you have the MB at limited abilities. Until Metabones can get full AF function it will remain a half baked solution. so for me could care less what the canon zoom does or how good it maybe the AF abilities alone in Sony will make me buy native or Sigma now. I still may go back and buy the Sigma 35 1.4 Art lens but not until that adapter is on the market.
Apr 03, 2016 at 09:53 AM
Previous versions of GMPhotography's message #13493291 « Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM Rolling Review »
