fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of Peire's message #13428311 « What is your most recent (alt) lens purchase? »

  

Peire
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: What is your most recent (alt) lens purchase?


Phillip Reeve wrote:


Peire wrote:
Phillip Reeve wrote:
freaklikeme wrote:
Phillip Reeve wrote:
  • Minolta MC 1.8/35
  • Minolta MC 1.4/50
  • Minolta MC 3.5/50 Macro
  • Minolta MC 1.7/85


    And a few other Minoltas (3.5/28, MD 2.8/135, 3.5/100 M) I won\'t keep.

    Nice. Love that 85.
    I look forward to the 35 because I have no experience with that. But yeah, the 85 is a very nice lens and I might keep it.


    The plain MD 135f2.8 is very good lens either.Also small and lightweight.


    I fear it is the Rokkor MD which I already own. It is a decent lens, but I find the CA quite bothersome and it is a bit heavy so the much lighte plain MD would be nice to own


    If its the plain MD,then it should have 5/5 lenses and different IQ (slightly less sharp in the centre,more even sharpness across the frame,less crisp overall,less CA overall),unlike the MD Rokkors MK 1/2 with 4/4 lensers.I say it beacuse being lazy, I take the plain MD 135/2.8-5/5 or 135/3.5-5/5, just because of their lightness and good/very good overall IQ,when I\'m back packing for a walk/short trip.

    CA with my \"regular APO\" 4/4 late MCs and early MDs 135/2.8 Minoltas MD are bearable and very easily removable in the PP.

    But what is the most important and everlasting,all those lenses serve superbly to photograph DUCKS,No matter the PP!.



  • Feb 21, 2016 at 04:49 AM
    Peire
    Offline
    Upload & Sell: On
    Re: What is your most recent (alt) lens purchase?


    Phillip Reeve wrote:


    Peire wrote:
    Phillip Reeve wrote:
    freaklikeme wrote:
    Phillip Reeve wrote:
  • Minolta MC 1.8/35
  • Minolta MC 1.4/50
  • Minolta MC 3.5/50 Macro
  • Minolta MC 1.7/85


    And a few other Minoltas (3.5/28, MD 2.8/135, 3.5/100 M) I won\'t keep.

    Nice. Love that 85.
    I look forward to the 35 because I have no experience with that. But yeah, the 85 is a very nice lens and I might keep it.


    The plain MD 135f2.8 is very good lens either.Also small and lightweight.


    I fear it is the Rokkor MD which I already own. It is a decent lens, but I find the CA quite bothersome and it is a bit heavy so the much lighte plain MD would be nice to own


    If its the plain MD,then it should have 5/5 lenses and different IQ (slightly less sharp in the centre,more even sharpness across the frame,less crisp overall,less CA overall),unlike the MD Rokkors MK 1/2 with 4/4 lenses.I say it beacuse being lazy, I take the plain MD 135/2.8-5/5 or 135/3.5-5/5, just because of their lightness and good/very good overall IQ,when I\'m back packing for a walk/short trip.

    CA with my \"regular APO\" 4/4 late MCs and early MDs 135/2.8 Minoltas MD are bearable and very easily removable in the PP.

    But what is the most important and everlasting,all those lenses serve superbly to photograph DUCKS,No matter the PP!.



  • Feb 20, 2016 at 11:20 AM





      Previous versions of Peire's message #13428311 « What is your most recent (alt) lens purchase? »