Re: Zeiss 35mm f1.4 ZM or Voigtlander 35mm f1.7 Ultron for La...
TY so much Steve
JaKo wrote:
You’re also incorrect about the center focusing point. See, by now each of my M-mount lenses is using its own, dedicated, high quality M-->E adapter that was adjusted/shimmed for hard stop at infinity (WO adjustment for the best across the frame compromise, based on field curvature)
You might want to check that one. Center is way sharper than outer zones, no?
I just assumed this must be because of the focal point, if not the ZM 35/1.4 landscape situation on the stock Sonys is worse than I thought.
I did not critique your frame, which is OK to get an idea of performance, and why else would you post it here? Those remarks, if you read my post carefully were not directed at you. I plead guilty on the focus issue though
Re: Zeiss 35mm f1.4 ZM or Voigtlander 35mm f1.7 Ultron for La...
TY so much Steve
JaKo wrote:
You’re also incorrect about the center focusing point. See, by now each of my M-mount lenses is using its own, dedicated, high quality M-->E adapter that was adjusted/shimmed for hard stop at infinity (WO adjustment for the best across the frame compromise, based on field curvature)
You might want to check that one. Center is way sharper than outer zones, no?
I just assumed this must be because of the focal point, if not the ZM 35/1.4 landscape situation on the stock Sonys is worse than I thought.
I did not critique your frame, which is OK to get an idea of performance, and why else would you post it here? Those remarks, if you read my post carefully were not directed at you. I plead guilty on the focus issue though
Re: Zeiss 35mm f1.4 ZM or Voigtlander 35mm f1.7 Ultron for La...
TY so much Steve
JaKo wrote:
You’re also incorrect about the center focusing point. See, by now each of my M-mount lenses is using its own, dedicated, high quality M-->E adapter that was adjusted/shimmed for hard stop at infinity (WO adjustment for the best across the frame compromise, based on field curvature)
You might want to check that one. Center is way sharper than outer zones, no?
I just assumed this must be because of the focal point, if not the ZM 35/1.4 landscape situation on the stock Sonys is worse than I thought.
I did not critique your frame, which is OK to get and idea of performance, why else would you post it here? Those remarks, if you read my post carefully were not directed at you. I plead guilty on the focus issue though
Re: Zeiss 35mm f1.4 ZM or Voigtlander 35mm f1.7 Ultron for La...
TY so much Steve
JaKo wrote:
You’re also incorrect about the center focusing point. See, by now each of my M-mount lenses is using its own, dedicated, high quality M-->E adapter that was adjusted/shimmed for hard stop at infinity (WO adjustment for the best across the frame compromise, based on field curvature)
You might want to check that one. Center is way sharper than outer zones, no?
I just assumed this must be because of the focal point, if not the ZM 35/1.4 landscape situation on the stock Sonys is worse than I thought.
Re: Zeiss 35mm f1.4 ZM or Voigtlander 35mm f1.7 Ultron for La...
TY so much Steve
JaKo wrote:
You’re also incorrect about the center focusing point. See, by now each of my M-mount lenses is using its own, dedicated, high quality M-->E adapter that was adjusted/shimmed for hard stop at infinity (WO adjustment for the best across the frame compromise, based on field curvature)
You might want to check that one. Center is way sharper than outer zones, no?
I just assumed this must because of the focal point, if not the ZM 35/1.4 landscape situation on the stock Sonys is worse than I thought.
Nov 10, 2015 at 06:49 PM
Previous versions of uhoh7's message #13283496 « Zeiss 35mm f1.4 ZM or Voigtlander 35mm f1.7 Ultron for Landscape with deep DOF for A7rM and A7rII »
