philber wrote:
Jack, if it is small size and sharpness that you are looking for in a Loxia 21,you cannot but be delighted. It is outstanding on both counts.Other aspects you might like or not, but not size and sharpness.
I am still going to stay with my WATE. The Loxia may be sharper and provide more EXIF information, not require an adapter, and has a smaller filter size. But, with my Phigment adapter and my WATE I have much more flexibility for focal lengths and recently the Loxia would not have allowed me to take some images without me possibly falling into a river and or down stream possibly to my death. Additionally the Loxia 21mm is about the weight of my Phigment adapter. With the adapter for the filters on my WATE though it is heavier than the Loxia.
Besides, at this point it is quite likely that I will be purchasing the Zeiss 35mm f1.4 ZM lens.
Rich
Nov 07, 2015 at 10:51 AM
Previous versions of naturephoto1's message #13278304 « Sony FE Images Thread »
