Re: Interesting Reference Data on Dynamic Range - 5dsr
RustyBug wrote:
+1 @ technical is \"en route\" to the gestalt.
And the notion that \"this is a technical forum\" (which we hear from time to time), while true, suggests a very limited idea of the purpose of the \"technical,\" perhaps that the technology itself and for its own singular sake is the only thing.
I\'m very interested in understanding and mastering the use of photography technology and I put a fair amount of energy into this, but the most fundamental standard of reference for me and virtually all photographers is how that technology plays out in the creation of photographs. Is it relevant? Does it make a difference? How significant of a difference? How do I use it? What do I see in my photographs?
Dan
Aug 16, 2015 at 10:22 AM
Previous versions of gdanmitchell's message #13152771 « Interesting Reference Data on Dynamic Range - 5dsr »
