Driveitputtit wrote: Vancouver47 wrote: Driveitputtit wrote:
Man, this crap gets so old...
very few photographers have the ability to maximize the perfection found in the Otus, and certainly wouldn\'t be here wasting time by trolling photographers that enjoy using a different piece of equipment for the work they do.
One of my Otus photos was used by Ziess at their recent Photokina booth display series. Another six are displayed on their Otus web sites. Obviously all accidents.
I\'m here by an accidental search and responded to a misguided comment about manual focus but couldn\'t resist responding to a 58 comparison. Our experience with the 58 was less than satisfactory. It\'s a soft, but less schizophrenic version of the Canon 50L. Both have their following among those who look at bokeh first and consider anything at the centre of the bokeh fringe to be sharp. By comparison it is, but.....
Driveitputtit wrote: Vancouver47 wrote: Driveitputtit wrote:
Man, this crap gets so old...
very few photographers have the ability to maximize the perfection found in the Otus, and certainly wouldn\'t be here wasting time by trolling photographers that enjoy using a different piece of equipment for the work they do.
One of my Otus photos was used by Ziess at their recent Photokina booth display series. Another six are displayed on their Otus web sites. Obviously all accidents.
I\'m here by an accidental search and responded to a misguided comment about manual focus but couldn\'t resist responding to a 58 comparison. Our experience with the 58 was less than satisfactory. It\'s a soft, but less schizophrenic version of the Canon 50L. Both have their following among those who look at bokeh first and consider anything at the centre of the bokeh fringe to be sharp. By comparison it is, but.....
If you would, please post them here.
Jun 06, 2015 at 08:52 AM
Previous versions of Vancouver47's message #13047394 « The 58mm F/1.4G Thread »
