Good catch !!! it says A7R below the photo, but the largest size shown is 8910 x 6300 ! So you are right :-) !!
Hope it is real and not interpolated !
Sorry to burst that.. but its interpolated. Very visible zig-zag pattern on eyelashes. etc.
zig-zag? are you looking at the full size orig or the tiny version linked/posted here?
when SAR posted the SR3 rumor based on this shot, they mentioned the camera is \'hand held\' for this shot and that made it less likely to have been interpolated (I\'ve never used interpolated cameras so I don\'t know)
+1 to that. I wouldn\'t be shocked either way to be honest and am not attached to the outcome (i.e., if it is interpolated or otherwise). Anyway, I downloaded the file and am looking at it at 100% and I do not see the zig-zag lines.
Edit: I stand corrected. I did find some spots with some funkiness going on. For exxample, If you look at the original picture at 100% and look at the outer section of the model\'s right eyebrow, you see a set of diagonal lines (going from NW to SE and parallel to each other).
Good catch !!! it says A7R below the photo, but the largest size shown is 8910 x 6300 ! So you are right :-) !!
Hope it is real and not interpolated !
Sorry to burst that.. but its interpolated. Very visible zig-zag pattern on eyelashes. etc.
zig-zag? are you looking at the full size orig or the tiny version linked/posted here?
when SAR posted the SR3 rumor based on this shot, they mentioned the camera is \'hand held\' for this shot and that made it less likely to have been interpolated (I\'ve never used interpolated cameras so I don\'t know)
+1 to that. I wouldn\'t be shocked either way to be honest and am not attached to the outcome (i.e., if it is interpolated or otherwise). Anyway, I downloaded the file and am looking at it at 100% and I do not see the zig-zag lines.
Apr 29, 2015 at 01:27 PM
Previous versions of abhijeeth's message #12990856 « Zeiss "Batis" AF lens line to be released for FF E-mount »
.