Re: 5DSR Low ISO DR 1.5-2 stops better than 1DX ...
Sometimes the discussions of \"tests\" of image go in very strange circles. To wit (with creative license):
\"I think my camera produces better [thing about image quality] than your camera.\"
\"My camera does just fine. Look at the results I get from it.\"
\"But still, there is something off about hour camera. It should be better. Like mine.\"
\"My photographs look great from my camera. Whatever it is you are seeing can\'t be important.\"
\"OK. I\'ll do a test. To ensure the validity of the test, I will eliminate all variables but the one I\'m testing, the performance of [thing x] on the two cameras. See [thing x] is [.24 units of something] better on my camera than on yours.\"
\"But I never make photographs that way! And no one goes looking for [thing x] by staring at two samples magnified to 100% on the screen side by side for an hour.\"
\"Yes, but there might be some situation some time in which it might be visible if we look just the right way and know what to look for.\"
\"OK, but that\'s only in controlled tests. In the real world you couldn\'t tell photos apart reliable based on that.\"
\"Are you saying that making cameras better doesn\'t matter? Why don\'t you shoot with a 6MP Rebel, or a Brownie.\"
and so it goes, off the cliff... ;-)
Feb 14, 2015 at 11:14 AM
Previous versions of gdanmitchell's message #12859615 « 5DSR Low ISO DR 1.5-2 stops better than 1DX ... »
