Re: Official: Canon 5DS, 5DS R and 11-24mm lens released!
Monito wrote:
I understand what you are saying, and that only applies when you have the time to deal with all three numbers manually...shitter, f stop and ISO.
I have to say that I agree that shitter speed control is sometimes very important, though the idea of controlling it \"manually\" raises a few questions... ;-)
jcolwell wrote:
Take a deep breath and then just ignore all of the useless talk...The trick is to navigate between the trolls and haters, without getting too pissed off.
We\'re going to have to ban you for your unreasonably reasonable perspective, too. ;-)
(Who reminds people that the \"hide me\" button can make forum participation a much more friendly proposition. If you don\'t like that, feel free to hide me! ;-)
howard wrote:
There is a forum (or forums) for that. This is a gear forum as such.
Yet, it seems to me that the meaning of the technical measurements and features is relative to their usefulness for \"that\" — the creation of photographs. It only matters that X has .1% more of Y to the extent that Y results in improvements in photographs. It is just about impossible — and certainly quite meaningless — to evaluate the technologies of photography without practical reference to their actual effects on the qualities that we value in photographs.
To my way of thinking, to do otherwise would be equivalent to having a forum on cooking gear that didn\'t care what the food tastes like.
Re: Official: Canon 5DS, 5DS R and 11-24mm lens released!
Monito wrote:
I understand what you are saying, and that only applies when you have the time to deal with all three numbers manually...shitter, f stop and ISO.
I have to say that I agree that shitter speed control is sometimes very important, though the idea of controlling it \"manually\" raises a few questions... ;-)
jcolwell wrote:
Take a deep breath and then just ignore all of the useless talk...The trick is to navigate between the trolls and haters, without getting too pissed off.
We\'re going to have to ban you for your unreasonably reasonable perspective, too. ;-)
(Who reminds people that the \"hide me\" button can make forum participation a much more friendly proposition. If you don\'t like that, feel free to hide me! ;-)
howard wrote:
There is a forum (or forums) for that. This is a gear forum as such.
Yet, it seems to me that the meaning of the technical measurements and features is relative to their usefulness for \"that\" — the creation of photographs. It only matters that X has .1% more of Y to the extent that Y results in improvements in photographs. It is just about impossible — and certainly quite meaningless — to evaluate the technologies of photography without practical reference to their actual effects on the qualities that we value in photographs.
Re: Official: Canon 5DS, 5DS R and 11-24mm lens released!
Monito wrote:
I understand what you are saying, and that only applies when you have the time to deal with all three numbers manually...shitter, f stop and ISO.
I have to say that I agree that shitter speed control is sometimes very important, though the idea of controlling it \"manually\" raises a few questions... ;-)
jcolwell wrote:
Take a deep breath and then just ignore all of the useless talk...The trick is to navigate between the trolls and haters, without getting too pissed off.
We\'re going to have to ban you for your unreasonably reasonable perspective, too. ;-)
Dan
(Who reminds people that the \"hide me\" button can make forum participation a much more friendly proposition. If you don\'t like that, feel free to hide me! ;-)
howard wrote:
There is a forum (or forums) for that. This is a gear forum as such.
Yet, it seems to me that the meaning of the technical measurements and features is relative to their usefulness for \"that\" — the creation of photographs. It only matters that X has .1% more of Y to the extent that Y results in improvements in photographs. It is just about impossible — and certainly quite meaningless — to evaluate the technologies of photography without practical reference to their actual effects on the qualities that we value in photographs.
Re: Official: Canon 5DS, 5DS R and 11-24mm lens released!
Monito wrote:
I understand what you are saying, and that only applies when you have the time to deal with all three numbers manually...shitter, f stop and ISO.
I have to say that I agree that shitter speed control is sometimes very important, though the idea of controlling it \"manually\" raises a few questions... ;-)
jcolwell wrote:
Take a deep breath and then just ignore all of the useless talk...The trick is to navigate between the trolls and haters, without getting too pissed off.
We\'re going to have to ban you for your unreasonably reasonable perspective, too. ;-)
Dan
(Who reminds people that the \"hide me\" button can make forum participation a much more friendly proposition. If you don\'t like that, feel free to hide me! ;-)
howard wrote:
There is a forum (or forums) for that. This is a gear forum as such.
Yet, it seems to me that the meaning of the technical measurements and features is relative to their usefulness for \"that\" — the creation of photographs. It only matters that X has .1% more of Y to the extent that Y results in improvements in photographs. It is just about impossible — and certainly quite meaningless — to evaluate the technologies of photography without practical reference to their actual effects on the qualities that we value in photographs.
Re: Official: Canon 5DS, 5DS R and 11-24mm lens released!
Monito wrote:
I understand what you are saying, and that only applies when you have the time to deal with all three numbers manually...shitter, f stop and ISO.
I have to say that I agree that shitter speed control is sometimes very important, though the idea of controlling it \"manually\" raises a few questions... ;-)
jcolwell wrote:
Take a deep breath and then just ignore all of the useless talk...The trick is to navigate between the trolls and haters, without getting too pissed off.
We\'re going to have to ban you for your unreasonably reasonable perspective, too. ;-)
Dan
(Who reminds people that the \"hide me\" button can make forum participation a much more friendly proposition. If you don\'t like that, feel free to hide me! ;-)
howard wrote:
There is a forum (or forums) for that. This is a gear forum as such.
Yet, it seems to me that the meaning of the technical measurements and features is relative to their usefulness for \"that\" — the creation of photographs. It only matters that X has .1% more of Y to the extent that Y results in improvements in photographs. It is just about impossible — and certainly quite meaningless — to evaluate the technologies of photography without reference to the qualities that we value in photographs.
Re: Official: Canon 5DS, 5DS R and 11-24mm lens released!
Monito wrote:
I understand what you are saying, and that only applies when you have the time to deal with all three numbers manually...shitter, f stop and ISO.
I have to say that I agree that shitter speed control is sometimes very important, though the idea of controlling it \"manually\" raises a few questions... ;-)
jcolwell wrote:
Take a deep breath and then just ignore all of the useless talk...The trick is to navigate between the trolls and haters, without getting too pissed off.
We\'re going to have to ban you for your unreasonably reasonable perspective, too. ;-)
Dan
(Who reminds people that the \"hide me\" button can make forum participation a much more friendly proposition. If you don\'t like that, feel free to hide me! ;-)
howard wrote:
There is a forum (or forums) for that. This is a gear forum as such.
Yet, it seems to me that the meaning of the technical measurements and features is relative to their usefulness for \"that\" — the creation of photographs. It only matters that X has .1% more of Y to the extent that Y results in improvements in photographs. It is just about impossible — and certainly quite meaningless — to evaluate the technologies of photography without reference to the qualities that we value on photographs.
Re: Official: Canon 5DS, 5DS R and 11-24mm lens released!
Monito wrote:
I understand what you are saying, and that only applies when you have the time to deal with all three numbers manually...shitter, f stop and ISO.
I have to say that I agree that shitter speed control is sometimes very important, though the idea of controlling it \"manually\" raises a few questions... ;-)
jcolwell wrote:
Take a deep breath and then just ignore all of the useless talk...The trick is to navigate between the trolls and haters, without getting too pissed off.
We\'re going to have to ban you for your unreasonably reasonable perspective, too. ;-)
Dan
(Who reminds people that the \"hide me\" button can make forum participation a much more friendly proposition. If you don\'t like that, feel free to hide me! ;-)
Re: Official: Canon 5DS, 5DS R and 11-24mm lens released!
Monito wrote:
I understand what you are saying, and that only applies when you have the time to deal with all three numbers manually...shitter, f stop and ISO.
I have to say that I agree that shitter speed control is sometimes very important, though the idea of controlling it \"manually\" raises a few questions... ;-)
Feb 06, 2015 at 12:58 PM
Previous versions of gdanmitchell's message #12843787 « Official: Canon 5DS, 5DS R and 11-24mm lens announced! »
