Re: A thinner sensor stack may be possible after all!
Hi Charlie,
I don\'t think there is an argument regarding M bodies being the better platform for M mount lenses. As I mentioned before the M9 had many vignetting and colour cast issues before the later FW updates. These corrections that must done with M mount WA\'s, either by in camera corrections or external software.
From what I observe, and I really did not expect the 28 Cron to perform as well, so the results are excellent IMO. With the A7rM having the 36MP and increased DR/higher ISO, this is great for those looking for landscape/seascapes.
The question of ergonomics is a personal choice. Having moved my M mount platform to Sony, I would not revert back unless Leica had a similar offering with a RF. Then of course there is a cost factor.
From what I have seen, the results are great with the \"thin filter modification\". For working with UWA\'s the Lr work flow will need to adapt some corrections, but this just takes a small amount of effort to set it up to begin and should be no real issue.
Hi Rich,
The corrections in Lr 5.7 mainly deal with geometric corrections for the M lenses rather colour cast and vignetting. I think that Adobe did not want to add another correction to the existing M9/M240 in-camera corrections.
Feb 03, 2015 at 07:51 PM
Previous versions of charles.K's message #12837894 « A thinner sensor stack may be possible after all! »
