jcolwell wrote: jcolwell wrote:
Three fps would be plenty for me, for a high MP, high DR camera for \'scenic\' photography. That\'s why the A7R is a bona fide contender for Canon users (I\'m on the fence...).
OTOH, for action photography, my 1DX and 1DIV have sufficient MP and DR.
EB-1 wrote:
I want 10FPS+ and 30MP+. It shouldn\'t be that difficult.
EBH
10 fps and 30 MP would be nice, but I\'d prefer 5 fps and 45MP. I\'d even settle for 60MP and 1 fps.
I would prefer if Canon separated high MP sensors from high FPS and came out with different bodies more appropriately suited along those lines. So the studio/landscape/architecture photogs can get the high resolution they need without paying for FPS which they\'ll likely seldom use, and the wedding/sports/PJ photogs can get the FPS they need without paying for the extra megapixels they\'ve seldom ever use.
We each buy different lenses for different shooting scenarios...so it should be with camera bodies
Oct 08, 2014 at 08:24 PM
Previous versions of artd's message #12621936 « OMG - 1DsX in NYC... »
