Re: Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless
FlyPenFly wrote:
It matters because it\'s $800.
I\'m considering if the $300 C/Y Zeiss 35mm f2.8 could possibly be better. Sure, no AF but maybe not so bad.
I guess if you look at Roger\'s numbers, it does seem to match up. It seems like no 35mm lenses have great corners on FF.
well if you\'re going mf I don\'t know if it would be on your radar but the canon 35mm f2 ltm seems like a decent performer. Mine is a little beat up so I don\'t know if she\'s 100% great but the images seemed pretty decent. It\'s VERY small too so you won\'t notice the few oz added to your kit. Only downside they cost a little more than the c/y Zeiss 35mm 2.8
Apr 13, 2014 at 12:18 PM
Previous versions of Dpedraza's message #12275812 « Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless »
