Re: Fujifilm X-Trans Infinity Scene RAW Processing Comparison
Sal Baker wrote:
I\'ve found that when Iridient has the occasional moire issue, Capture One is a much better fallback then LR. 16x20 inch prints look beautiful from X-Trans II files so I think I need to back off from microscopic pixel level analysis for a while.
Sal
It\'s interesting with this particular problem image because, to my eye, Capture One completely fails with this image, even compared to Adobe at reduced size for soft proofing a 16 x24\" print - so not microscopic pixel level but what the print is going to look like.
Each image was resized to 16\"x24\"@240ppi and then downsized 50% for soft proofing. Of the X-E2 versions, I think Adobe is still better here. Capture One seems to make a mess of all the branches - and still shows some color issues compared to Adobe.
Mar 10, 2014 at 04:27 PM
Previous versions of Tariq Gibran's message #12193593 « Fujifilm X-Trans Infinity Scene RAW Processing Comparison »
