form wrote:
I\'m actually just hoping that these are all from in-camera JPG products and that using your own RAW converter (lightroom etc.) will not show some of these things.
However the shot that I was concerned with initially (blotches of yellow/magenta in dark areas of detail) was taken at only...ISO3200.
I have always ever tried to be objectively critical. In truth, I\'d like to see the camera excel because it may be the only thing that could make me consider Nikon in the long term (both from business and quality angles). I tend to like everything about Canon except their very shadow-noisy/inflexible images at low ISO (and the 5d3\'s colors I don\'t like, and the 5d3\'s new focus-pause-focus-lock AF delay system), but I have a D800 solely because of the sensor\'s low ISO dynamic range. It would be nice if Nikon also did some other things better than Canon, like having really fast-focusing primes and offering better high ISO noise. Right now, the 1dx has pretty much the lead position for dynamic range retention at sensibly high ISO settings, and Canon has faster-focusing prime lenses for the most part.
that last part is an opinion that tends to be only shared by those using that particular camera. there have been attempts to woo me back to the C product. but so far it has not been an option.
Mar 10, 2014 at 10:14 AM
Previous versions of sjms's message #12192838 « D4S anyone?? »
