By the way, I did some infinity comparisons between M9 with ZM 35/2 and 50/2, and A7 with FE 35/2.8 and 55/1.8.
Without boring you with meaningless test shots and 100% crops, I found out that overall the ZM 35/2 is clearly superior to the the FE 35/2.8, except in the very extreme corners where the ZM is known to have a weakness. The FE 35 is a pancake lens and it seems some compromises have been made. Not too bad but the ZM really sparkles.
As for the ZM 50/2, unfortunately it doesn\'t compare favorably as it has no way to compete with the superb resolution of the FE, which is considered one of the best standard lenses currently, slightly behind the Otus. Only at f/8 I may have found a slight advantage for the ZM but only in the very center of the frame (probably the FE is already suffering from some diffraction), everywhere else the FE is just amazing.
