Karl Witt wrote:
I can\'t believe the opinions being formed over casually shot dog images. No offense to big country but I don\'t think these are any indication of IQ and sharpness. Heck I own a cheap Tamron 70-300 that is sweetly sharp. Are we really going to judge a new lens from such simple shots and on a non micro adjusted body for the lens? Would we accept that for a new canon lens?
I am not quick to judge by casual shots. Detail in fur and feathers takes technique and proper focus and DOF. At such close proximity we are very limited on any DOF. I still think the goods of this lens are soon to come!
I have seen very poor image quality posted with $15k worth of gear the same gear I see exquisite images come from. Best to not make judgement yet and keep an open mind😉
Karl📷
Karl, no one is making quick judgements, all we are doing is analysing what was put in front of us. No one has said, well that\'s it, it\'s rubbish and I won\'t buying it. Plenty of water to pass under the bridge before making that decision either way. As I see, the issues may be as much camera related as lens related. My 7D doesn\'t do so well with low textured fur and I\'ve seen plenty of shots like these even on my 300 f/2.8.
Jan 17, 2014 at 01:30 AM
Previous versions of Pixel Perfect's message #12071348 « Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm »
