I\'ve only had the a7R since late last week. But I\'m able to get sharp images...both tripod and hand held. (Although more of my use has been tripod mounted.)
Coming from a 5D II, I don\'t have any image quality complaints.
Here\'s a fulls size shot...granted it\'s a longer exposure tripod mounted, but I\'m very extremely with it.
arbitrage wrote:
The fact that this Sony camera is compressing all the RAW files to 37MB when we know the D800E can produce 60MB + files is enough to keep me from jumping in to this system for the time being. The fact that the A7r is showing a lot of problem with vibrations at slower shutter speeds is my other main issue with this new camera.
This camera is only useful for shooting low ISO, tripod mounted landscapes where you actually get more DR than a typical 5D3 sensor and would be nice as a travel, hiking, more portable camera with smaller prime lenses. However, if you can\'t get a sharp shot even on a tripod because your low ISO that you need for good DR is causing a low SS that in turn causes vibration and ruins the sharpness then this camera is next to useless in my shooting. I\'ll wait till round two on this one and see what they can improve upon. In the meantime I picked up a Fuji XE-2 to use for my travel, hiking, portable camera and I will keep waiting on my high DR camera or maybe just go and get a D800E with 14-24 and call it a day
Dec 10, 2013 at 10:17 AM
Previous versions of tsdevine's message #11992286 « Sony A7 and A7r Full Frame with Canon Lenses »
