The left side is the A7, the right is the A7r -- they don\'t seem so terribly differently exposed to me.
I see the yellow (shadow area) and the satellite dish both about 10-13 points difference between the A7 vs. A7R. Some diff, but not radically overexposed. Looking at the A7R \"blown\" area it is only 229,229,229, so not really blown, but very neutral compared to the other @ A7 with a much lower blue channel in the A7 @ 235, 221, 192 shifting us from warm to neutral.
The same variance can be seen on the left side buildings so the two (A7 vs. A7R) seem to be at different WB\'s.
The left side is the A7, the right is the A7r -- they don\'t seem so terribly differently exposed to me.
I see the yellow (shadow area) and the satellite dish both about 10-13 points difference between the A7 vs. A7R. Some diff, but not radically overexposed. Looking at the A7R \"blown\" area it is only 229,229,229, so not really blown, but very neutral compared to the other @ A7 with a much lower blue channel in the A7 @ 235, 221, 192 shifting us from warm to neutral.
The left side is the A7, the right is the A7r -- they don\'t seem so terribly differently exposed to me.
I see the yellow (shadow area) and the satellite dish both about 10-13 points difference. Some diff, but not radically overexposed. Looking at the A7R \"blown\" area it is only 229,229,229, so not really blown, but very neutral compared to the other with a much lower blue channel in the A7 @ 235, 221, 192.
Dec 02, 2013 at 09:31 PM
Previous versions of RustyBug's message #11974902 « A7/A7r - performance with WA RF lenses »