jcolwell wrote: Mikael Risedal wrote:
well , then you understand right, download d800 25600iso raw and for example 1dx 25600iso raw from Dpreview and compare d800 with 1dx and 1dx file size, every one can then check by them self resolution/noise
Not relevant.
The 18 MP sensor on the 1DX is part of a balanced system that can sustain 12 fps shooting in challenging AF situations. The 36 MP sensor on the D800 is part of a balanced system that provides superior DR at 4 fps. They\'re built for different purposes. Both are \"superior\" cameras, but not with respect to each other.
Im know that, but here we was discussing if Sonys sensor work \"over 1600iso\" read above or if the sensor are inferior to high iso compared to Canon 5dmk3 as a another example
and because of raw wise ADC the Sony can still produce superior DR at higher speed than 4fps due the low read out noise
quote from above : Canon’s EOS 5D Mark III, our 2012 Camera of the Year and still the reigning low-light champ, is way ahead of the 7R in this regard, with acceptable noise through ISO 25,600; the 7R hits this boundary at ISO 1600. end quote
jcolwell wrote: Mikael Risedal wrote:
well , then you understand right, download d800 25600iso raw and for example 1dx 25600iso raw from Dpreview and compare d800 with 1dx and 1dx file size, every one can then check by them self resolution/noise
Not relevant.
The 18 MP sensor on the 1DX is part of a balanced system that can sustain 12 fps shooting in challenging AF situations. The 36 MP sensor on the D800 is part of a balanced system that provides superior DR at 4 fps. They\'re built for different purposes. Both are \"superior\" cameras, but not with respect to each other.
Im know that, but here we was discussing if Sonys sensor work \"over 1600iso\" read above or if the sensor are inferior to high iso compared to Canon 5dmk3 as a another example
and because of raw wise ADC the Sony can still produce superior DR at higher speed than 4fps due the low read out noise
quote: Canon’s EOS 5D Mark III, our 2012 Camera of the Year and still the reigning low-light champ, is way ahead of the 7R in this regard, with acceptable noise through ISO 25,600; the 7R hits this boundary at ISO 1600. end quote
jcolwell wrote: Mikael Risedal wrote:
well , then you understand right, download d800 25600iso raw and for example 1dx 25600iso raw from Dpreview and compare d800 with 1dx and 1dx file size, every one can then check by them self resolution/noise
Not relevant.
The 18 MP sensor on the 1DX is part of a balanced system that can sustain 12 fps shooting in challenging AF situations. The 36 MP sensor on the D800 is part of a balanced system that provides superior DR at 4 fps. They\'re built for different purposes. Both are \"superior\" cameras, but not with respect to each other.
Im know that, but here we was discussing if Sonys sensor work \"over 1600iso\" read above or if the sensor are inferior to high iso compared to Canon 5dmk3 as a another example
and because of raw wise ADC the Sony can still produce superior DR at higher speed than 4fps due the low read out noise
Nov 28, 2013 at 06:16 PM
Previous versions of Mikael Risedal's message #11966319 « Sony A7 and A7r Full Frame with Canon Lenses »
