Re: Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless
^ Do realize waterden, the A7r also lacks electronic first curtain - this is an important distinction between it and the A7, and can be the cause for some image shake (and is the primary reason I didn\'t go for the A7r).
Also, and this may seem strange, but -- Images that aren\'t perfectly sharp, believe it or not, can still be keepers.
I can\'t count how many times I\'ve used and posted older A850 shots that weren\'t exactly sharp (at 100%) because of movement (remember when 24MP was obscene?), yet when viewing online at web sizes or even printed, it was impossible to detect the motion.
The beauty of downscaling.
That\'s what a lot of people seem to forget when we talking about these high-MP sensors in the digital age:
At normal (typical) output sizes, it\'s not going to matter if you have slight image shake...the image won\'t look worse.
It\'s when you start getting into obscene print sizes that it really starts to matter, and if you\'re doing obscene print sizes, you\'re taking every precaution anyway (tripod, timers, remote releases, shutter speeds), so the shake \"problem\" isn\'t a problem at all.
Re: Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless
^ Do realize waterden, the A7r also lacks electronic first curtain - this is an important distinction between it and the A7, and can be the cause for some image shake (and is the primary reason I didn\'t go for the A7r).
Also, and this may seem strange, but -- Images that aren\'t perfectly sharp, believe it or not, can still be keepers.
I can\'t count how many times I\'ve used and posted older A850 shots that weren\'t exactly sharp (at 100%) because of movement (remember when 24MP was obscene?), yet when viewing online at web sizes or even printed, it was impossible to detect the motion.
The beauty of downscaling.
Nov 16, 2013 at 11:13 AM
Previous versions of cputeq's message #11937146 « Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless »
