No worries Jimmy G ... to further (hopefully) enhance my understanding of what we are saying here, is it then correct that the pseudo ISO 3200 is in essence the same capture @ RAW in camera base ISO with two different locations (one in camera vs. one in post) for applying the gain as if we had shot it at ISO 3200 and it would have allowed us to have a \"normal\" exposure with a shutter of 1/125 from the camera settings?
So, in essence ... everything we shoot is really at base ISO, just a matter of where/how much the gain algorithm is being applied (i.e. in camera vs. in pp), is that correct?
No worries Jimmy G ... to further (hopefully) enhance my understanding of what we are saying here, is it then correct that the pseudo ISO 3200 is in essence the same capture @ RAW in camera base ISO with two different locations (one in camera vs. one in post) for applying the gain as if we had shot it at ISO 3200 and it would have allowed us to have a \"normal\" exposure with a shutter of 1/125 from the camera settings?
So, in essence ... everything we shoot is really at base ISO, just a matter of where/how much the gain algorithm is being applied
No worries Jimmy G ... to further (hopefully) enhance my understanding of what we are saying here, is it then correct that the pseudo ISO 3200 is in essence the same capture @ RAW in camera base ISO with two different locations (one in camera vs. one in post) for applying the gain as if we had shot it at ISO 3200 and it would have allowed us to have a \"normal\" exposure with a shutter of 1/125 from the camera settings?
So, in essence ... everything we shoot is really at base ISO, just a matter of where/how much the gain algorithm is being applied?
Nov 06, 2013 at 11:04 AM
Previous versions of RustyBug's message #11915469 « ettr - an urban legend? »
