fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of RustyBug's message #11914931 « ettr - an urban legend? »
  

RustyBug
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: ettr - an urban legend?


Phillip Reeve wrote:
All images were taken at Iso 100
I varied the shutterspeed from 1 second for the Iso 25 shot to 1/125 for the Iso 3200 shot.
Then I compensated for the over/under-exposure in LR, to equalize the brightness
so the \"Iso 3200\" shot was pushed 5 stops.
I used M mode


Thanks Phillip ... that\'s exactly the BIG CRAYON that I needed. Sorry for the confusion that I wasn\'t as adept to follow earlier as the others did.

Thanks to Phillip (et al). I\'m still \"shaking head\" a bit, but now in wonderment @ why moreover than disbelief. Now it would be really interesting to see the same test Sony vs. Canon (link to pre-existing examples would be fine).

Judging from your tests (both Phillip & sebboh) ... which of the two exposure strategies would you suggest using as best for highlights, best for shadows?

I hope you don\'t mind (just say and I\'ll pull), but here\'s a rough to see how far I might take the file from the adobe default image ... and the penalties incurred. Highly subjective @ liberties of course.


Nov 06, 2013 at 11:18 AM
RustyBug
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: ettr - an urban legend?


Phillip Reeve wrote:
All images were taken at Iso 100
I varied the shutterspeed from 1 second for the Iso 25 shot to 1/125 for the Iso 3200 shot.
Then I compensated for the over/under-exposure in LR, to equalize the brightness
so the \"Iso 3200\" shot was pushed 5 stops.
I used M mode


Thanks Phillip ... that\'s exactly the BIG CRAYON that I needed. Sorry for the confusion that I wasn\'t as adept to follow earlier as the others did.

Thanks to Phillip (et al). I\'m still \"shaking head\" a bit, but now in wonderment @ why moreover than disbelief. Now it would be really interesting to see the same test Sony vs. Canon (link to pre-existing examples would be fine).

Judging from your tests (both Phillip & sebboh) ... which of the two exposure strategies would you suggest using as best for highlights, best for shadows?

I hope you don\'t mind (just say and I\'ll pull), but here\'s a rough to see how far I might take the file from the adobe default image ... and the penalties incurred. Highly subjective liberties of course (incurred some banding @ small jpg).


Nov 06, 2013 at 08:14 AM
RustyBug
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: ettr - an urban legend?


Phillip Reeve wrote:
All images were taken at Iso 100
I varied the shutterspeed from 1 second for the Iso 25 shot to 1/125 for the Iso 3200 shot.
Then I compensated for the over/under-exposure in LR, to equalize the brightness
so the \"Iso 3200\" shot was pushed 5 stops.
I used M mode


Thanks Phillip ... that\'s exactly the BIG CRAYON that I needed. Sorry for the confusion that I wasn\'t as adept to follow earlier as the others did.

Thanks to Phillip (et al). I\'m still \"shaking head\" a bit, but now in wonderment @ why moreover than disbelief. Now it would be really interesting to see the same test Sony vs. Canon (link to pre-existing examples would be fine).

Judging from your tests (both Phillip & sebboh) ... which of the two exposure strategies would you suggest using as best for highlights, best for shadows?

I hope you don\'t mind (just say and I\'ll pull), but here\'s a rough to see how far I might take the file from the adobe default image ... and the penalties incurred. Highly subjective liberties of course (incurred some banding @ small jpg).


Nov 06, 2013 at 08:13 AM
RustyBug
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: ettr - an urban legend?


Phillip Reeve wrote:
All images were taken at Iso 100
I varied the shutterspeed from 1 second for the Iso 25 shot to 1/125 for the Iso 3200 shot.
Then I compensated for the over/under-exposure in LR, to equalize the brightness
so the \"Iso 3200\" shot was pushed 5 stops.
I used M mode


Thanks Phillip ... that\'s exactly the BIG CRAYON that I needed. Sorry for the confusion that I wasn\'t as adept to follow earlier as the others did.

Thanks to Phillip (et al). I\'m still \"shaking head\" a bit, but now in wonderment @ why moreover than disbelief. Now it would be really interesting to see the same test Sony vs. Canon (link to pre-existing examples would be fine).

Judging from your tests (both Phillip & sebboh) ... which of the two exposure strategies would you suggest using as best for highlights, best for shadows?

I hope you don\'t mind (just say and I\'ll pull), but here\'s a rough to see how far I might take the file from the adobe default image ... and the penalties incurred. Highly subjective liberties of course (incurred some banding @ small jpg).


Nov 06, 2013 at 07:59 AM
RustyBug
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: ettr - an urban legend?


Phillip Reeve wrote:
All images were taken at Iso 100
I varied the shutterspeed from 1 second for the Iso 25 shot to 1/125 for the Iso 3200 shot.
Then I compensated for the over/under-exposure in LR, to equalize the brightness
so the \"Iso 3200\" shot was pushed 5 stops.
I used M mode


Thanks Phillip ... that\'s exactly the BIG CRAYON that I needed. Sorry for the confusion that I wasn\'t as adept to follow earlier as the others did.

Thanks to Phillip (et al). I\'m still \"shaking head\" a bit, but now in wonderment @ why moreover than disbelief. Now it would be really interesting to see the same test Sony vs. Canon (link to pre-existing examples would be fine).

Judging from your tests (both Phillip & sebboh) ... which of the two exposure strategies would you suggest using as best for highlights, best for shadows?

I hope you don\'t mind (just say and I\'ll pull), but here\'s a rough of where I took the file from the adobe default image ... subjective liberties of course (incurred some banding @ small jpg).


Nov 06, 2013 at 07:56 AM
RustyBug
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: ettr - an urban legend?


Phillip Reeve wrote:
All images were taken at Iso 100
I varied the shutterspeed from 1 second for the Iso 25 shot to 1/125 for the Iso 3200 shot.
Then I compensated for the over/under-exposure in LR, to equalize the brightness
so the \"Iso 3200\" shot was pushed 5 stops.
I used M mode


Thanks Phillip ... that\'s exactly the BIG CRAYON that I needed. Sorry for the confusion that I wasn\'t as adept to follow earlier as the others did.

Thanks to Phillip (et al). I\'m still \"shaking head\" a bit, but now in wonderment @ why moreover than disbelief. Now it would be really interesting to see the same test Sony vs. Canon (link to pre-existing examples would be fine).

Judging from your tests (both Phillip & sebboh) ... which of the two exposure strategies would you suggest using as best for highlights, best for shadows?

I hope you don\'t mind (just say and I\'ll pull), but here\'s a rough of where I took the file from the adobe default image ... subjective liberties of course (incurred some banding).


Nov 06, 2013 at 07:55 AM
RustyBug
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: ettr - an urban legend?


Phillip Reeve wrote:
All images were taken at Iso 100
I varied the shutterspeed from 1 second for the Iso 25 shot to 1/125 for the Iso 3200 shot.
Then I compensated for the over/under-exposure in LR, to equalize the brightness
so the \"Iso 3200\" shot was pushed 5 stops.
I used M mode


Thanks Phillip ... that\'s exactly the BIG CRAYON that I needed. Sorry for the confusion that I wasn\'t as adept to follow earlier as the others did.

Thanks to Phillip (et al). I\'m still \"shaking head\" a bit, but now in wonderment @ why moreover than disbelief. Now it would be really interesting to see the same test Sony vs. Canon (link to pre-existing examples would be fine).

Judging from your tests (both Phillip & sebboh) ... which of the two exposure strategies would you suggest using as best for highlights, best for shadows?

I hope you don\'t mind (just say and I\'ll pull), but here\'s a rough of where I took the file from the adobe default image ... subjective liberties of course (incurred some banding).


Nov 06, 2013 at 07:51 AM
RustyBug
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: ettr - an urban legend?


Phillip Reeve wrote:
All images were taken at Iso 100
I varied the shutterspeed from 1 second for the Iso 25 shot to 1/125 for the Iso 3200 shot.
Then I compensated for the over/under-exposure in LR, to equalize the brightness
so the \"Iso 3200\" shot was pushed 5 stops.
I used M mode


Thanks Phillip ... that\'s exactly the BIG CRAYON that I needed. Sorry for the confusion that I wasn\'t as adept to follow earlier as the others did.

Thanks to Phillip (et al). I\'m still \"shaking head\" a bit, but now in wonderment @ why moreover than disbelief. Now it would be really interesting to see the same test Sony vs. Canon (link to pre-existing examples would be fine).

Judging from your tests (both Phillip & sebboh) ... which of the two exposure strategies would you suggest using as best for highlights, best for shadows?

I hope you don\'t mind (just say and I\'ll pull), but here\'s a rough of where I took the file from the adobe default image ... subjective liberties of course (incurred some banding).


Nov 06, 2013 at 06:05 AM





  Previous versions of RustyBug's message #11914931 « ettr - an urban legend? »