hiepphotog wrote:
All images were taken at ISO 100 with various EC settings: +2, +1, 0, -1, -2, -3, -4, -5 (from top to bottom).
I\'m missing something here ...
How are we taking an exposures with 7 stops of EC and still getting relatively the same \"proper\" exposures, except by the offsetting shutter speed? And how is that putting us at ETTR? It sounds like we are just have offsetting shutter speed for the EC @ push/pull ... not really ETTR?
Sorry, if I\'m a bit slow on this one ... sometimes I need things drawn with a REALLY BIG CRAYON for me to get it.
The biggest diff I see is the ISO of the last one not actually being as ambitious (i.e. double) as the indicated value. Thus a 2X (or 1/2) shutter speed is overcompensating for a less than double ISO response.
hiepphotog wrote:
All images were taken at ISO 100 with various EC settings: +2, +1, 0, -1, -2, -3, -4, -5 (from top to bottom).
I\'m missing something here ...
How are we taking an exposures with 7 stops of EC and still getting relatively the same \"proper\" exposures, except by the offsetting shutter speed? And how is that putting us at ETTR? It sounds like we are just have offsetting shutter speed for the EC @ push/pull ... not really ETTR?
Sorry, if I\'m a bit slow on this one ... sometimes I need things drawn with a REALLY BIG CRAYON for me to get it.
The biggest diff I see is the ISO of the last one not being as ambitious as the others.
Nov 05, 2013 at 09:42 PM
Previous versions of RustyBug's message #11914341 « ettr - an urban legend? »
